Case Law20 April 20256 min read

Supreme Court Settles Software TDS — Royalty or Not?

Engineering Analysis v. CIT — the ruling that ends a 20-year dispute

The Supreme Court's landmark ruling in Engineering Analysis clarifies when software payments attract TDS under Section 194J as royalty — and when they don't. Every CA handling tech clients needs to know this.

The Supreme Court's ruling in Engineering Analysis Centre of Excellence Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax (2022) — commonly called the "Engineering Analysis" case — settled a dispute that had been litigated for over two decades.

The Question

When a company buys software — off-the-shelf, shrink-wrapped, or even downloaded — and pays for it, is that payment a "royalty" attracting TDS under Section 194J?

If yes, TDS at 10% applies. If no, no TDS.

For multinational software companies and their Indian distributors, this was not a ₹10,000 question. It was a ₹4,000-crore question.

The Arguments

Revenue's position: Software is "copyright" or a "copyrighted article." Payment for it is royalty under Section 9(1)(vi). TDS must be deducted.

Assessee's position: When you buy a standard software product, you're buying a copyrighted article — like buying a book. You don't acquire any right in the copyright itself. No royalty. No TDS.

The Ruling

The Supreme Court ruled in favour of the assessee — overwhelmingly and clearly.

The court held that:

  1. 1A "royalty" requires transfer of a right in the copyright — not merely the right to use a copyrighted product
  2. 2End-user licence agreements (EULAs) for standard software give the user only a limited licence to use the software, not any right in the copyright
  3. 3Payment for a shrink-wrapped or downloaded software product is not royalty — it's the price of a product
  4. 4The distinction is: are you paying to use the copyright, or paying for a product that happens to be copyrighted?

What This Means Practically

No TDS required on:

  • Microsoft Office licences
  • Adobe Creative Cloud subscriptions
  • SAP, Oracle, or any other standard software product
  • App store purchases
  • SaaS subscriptions where the customer has no copyright interest

TDS still required on:

  • Custom software development (this is a service — Section 194J applies)
  • Software where source code is transferred (copyright transfer)
  • Payments specifically for modification rights

The DTAA Angle

For payments to non-residents, the ruling also affects Article 12 of tax treaties. If the payment is not "royalty" under domestic law, the DTAA classification similarly changes — potentially bringing the payment under "business profits" (Article 7) which is taxable only if there's a PE in India.

For most foreign software vendors with no Indian PE, this means zero withholding tax on software payments.

The Departmental Position After the Ruling

Despite the Supreme Court ruling, some field officers continued raising demands. The CBDT has since issued a circular acknowledging the ruling and directing AOs not to raise fresh demands on software payments covered by Engineering Analysis.

If you have pending demands on software TDS, the Engineering Analysis ruling is your primary defence.

The complete case law analysis — with 11 related cases, the DTAA implications, and the CBDT circular text — is Episode 6 of TDS Mastery on MentorClub.

Go deeper on MentorClub

This was the free preview.

Full audio episode with worked examples, case law citations, and AI Mentor — ask your follow-up questions instantly.

Get Full Access →